Page 2 of 2

Re: CCC#4 Results ~!

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 5:59 pm
by Demerzel
Question: are names like 'Super Divine Dragon Of Requiem' actually considered well made? No offense to anyone in particular, and I know that existing cards have similar retarded names.

Re: CCC#4 Results ~!

Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 6:08 pm
by Relinquished
Micky wrote:
Relinquished wrote:Oh yeah, my card also has power attacker of 3000. I think you forgot it.
Oh right, totally forgot to add it when I was adding the + sign. Anyways, fixed.
And now you removed the + from the number...

Re: CCC#4 Results ~!

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:26 pm
by Micky
Demerzel wrote:Question: are names like 'Super Divine Dragon Of Requiem' actually considered well made? No offense to anyone in particular, and I know that existing cards have similar retarded names.
I am not sure what your issue if with that name, but it sounds perfectly fine to me. Names that have a connection to any other part of the card are mostly considered well made. As far as the similarity to the game is concerned, yes making things that one would expect from the game-makers is considered a good thing; although innovation is still at the heart of this contest, and when well executed it is always highly credited.
Relinquished wrote:And now you removed the + from the number...
Ahh, sorry. I forgot that I haven't saved it after I added the plus sign. Well anyways, fixed it now.