KirriCorp

Nikhil wrote:This is what I had in mind for the upper part. I do not know whether the rules part is necessary and have not decided on how the bottom part looks best.

It would be even better if you had any idea what you were doing.

I figure having uniform colors for creatures makes more sense considering how many different colors we have now.

I'll have a spell done soon.

I like this one a lot. Looks like a professional card.

Burner wrote:I figure having uniform colors for creatures makes more sense considering how many different colors we have now.

I'll have a spell done soon.

I find the triangle behind the Ice logo a bit annoying, it doesn't settle in easily for me. The cost number has this sideways triangle, which I don't see the point in having. If its a styling thing, then It should be centered in the area above the image, i.e a little higher. Also even though it looks "okay" with cost 7, I think it'll look really awkward with a number like 6 or 4. Other than that the card name text isn't as clear and easy to read as it should be, it should at least be as big as the Quadrant/Attribute and Race text if not bigger.

I disagree with you, Micky, on nearly every point. I absolutely love this design and feel that we're moving in a positive direction. The only things I really agree with are the name text and the tiny white triangle next to the cost.

Rashaskool wrote:I disagree with you, Micky, on nearly every point. I absolutely love this design and feel that we're moving in a positive direction. The only things I really agree with are the name text and the tiny white triangle next to the cost.

Dude, its not really "disagreeing on nearly every point" when you are agreeing with 2 of the 3 things I said.

Micky wrote:

Rashaskool wrote:I disagree with you, Micky, on nearly every point. I absolutely love this design and feel that we're moving in a positive direction. The only things I really agree with are the name text and the tiny white triangle next to the cost.

Dude, its not really "disagreeing on nearly every point" when you are agreeing with 2 of the 3 things I said.

I agree with the name text only. I like that small triangle next to cost.
And Micky no need to jump so much at fonts. A proper font can be agreed upon later. It is possible Burner is using it temporarily.

Nikhil wrote:

Micky wrote:

Rashaskool wrote:I disagree with you, Micky, on nearly every point. I absolutely love this design and feel that we're moving in a positive direction. The only things I really agree with are the name text and the tiny white triangle next to the cost.

Dude, its not really "disagreeing on nearly every point" when you are agreeing with 2 of the 3 things I said.

I agree with the name text only. I like that small triangle next to cost.
And Micky no need to jump so much at fonts. A proper font can be agreed upon later. It is possible Burner is using it temporarily.

As for the font of the cost number, I don't dislike that at all. I was pointing out that other numbers would look awkward when but along side the triangle and that the 7 is looking "okay" because of the correlating shape it has with the triangle.

I didn't even say anything about the fonts, I like the fonts. I said it needs to be 'bigger' so that its clear and easy to read. Please get your facts straight before telling me what I should and shouldn't do.

Yeah I wrote the first part. Realized i agreed one some and then added that. But yeah.

That card's background should be in a forest or something, @ first page.