MIAR requested that Nikhil be unbanned from KC. Since there were no objections, Nikhil is back on KP and chats as of yesterday morning.
His KP and Forum username is simply Nikhil.
Please don't be a nuisance, so I don't have to re-ban you.
Troll Nikhil unbanned by request of MIAR
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 5:59 pm
Re: Troll Nikhil unbanned by request of MIAR
Wait wait, why couldn't you guys do that way before? A small community not giving second chances..? That's a pity.
- Relinquished
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 6:54 am
- Location: The Cold North
Re: Troll Nikhil unbanned by request of MIAR
Obviously the "second chance" had already been given, or then the thing he did was so bad that he didn't deserve one.
Avatar art made by Rashaskool.
- dorphadios1
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:41 am
- Location: Under the sea
Re: Troll Nikhil unbanned by request of MIAR
I don't really know what did he do but he should be forgiven.The more people,the more fun!

Re: Troll Nikhil unbanned by request of MIAR
For clarification, originally, when Nikhil was first banned (or I should say banned for the second time), he made the same argument, that he should be allowed back if people wanted it.
Back then, no one who actually used chats wanted him back.
Therefore when he returned this time the same condition was applied. If anyone wanted him back, he could come back.
It took a while for anyone to actually say so, and I don't know what changed MIAR's mind (he was not originally going for it), but now there is finally someone who does want him back, so, he is back.
Second chances only apply when at least SOMEONE opposes the banning, back then, no one did.
Back then, no one who actually used chats wanted him back.
Therefore when he returned this time the same condition was applied. If anyone wanted him back, he could come back.
It took a while for anyone to actually say so, and I don't know what changed MIAR's mind (he was not originally going for it), but now there is finally someone who does want him back, so, he is back.
Second chances only apply when at least SOMEONE opposes the banning, back then, no one did.
In chats wrote:<Wedjat> Why is there no function for converting "antagonizing fools" into "delightful servants"?
<ri> you don't have access to defool.exe?
<Wedjat> It would be an illegal operation.
<Bell> SIGGED
<Wedjat> \o/