Page 1 of 1

Uncertainty

Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 7:29 pm
by Shade
Creatures (10 Radiance, 16 Gravity, 4 Fire, 30 Total):
2 x Ars Megistus --- [cost 5 Radiance]
3 x Mesmera Cobra --- [cost 3 Gravity]
3 x Ghost Jellyfish --- [cost 3 Gravity]
1 x Black Carpet --- [cost 9 Gravity]
3 x Indigo --- [cost 4 Gravity]
1 x Funeral Pyre --- [cost 7 Fire]
2 x Violet Violence --- [cost 3 Fire]
2 x Starbutton --- [cost 2 Radiance]
1 x Sables Duress --- [cost 7 Fire]
3 x Sentient Gorge --- [cost 4 Gravity]
3 x Ribbon Slasher --- [cost 5 Gravity]
2 x Iris Memoria --- [cost 2 Radiance]
3 x Engorica --- [cost 3 Radiance]
1 x Somnia Pollyn --- [cost 8 Radiance]

Spells (10 Gravity, 10 Total):
2 x Equalizing Pressure --- [cost 5 Gravity]
3 x Memory Loss --- [cost 4 Gravity]
2 x Impel End --- [cost 5 Gravity]
3 x Wormhole --- [cost 2 Gravity]

Cost info:
1 :
2 : RR RR GG G
3 : RR RG GG GG GF F
4 : GG GG GG GG G
5 : RR GG GG GG G
6 :
7 : FF
8 : R
9 : G

Average cost = 3.975

Creatures / Spells / Runes: 30/10/0

10 Radiance, 0 Wind, 0 Ice, 0 Water, 26 Gravity, 0 Earth, 4 Fire, 0 Lightning

Blockers: 15.000001% (6/40).
Damage 2: 2.5% (1/40).
Exhausters: 2.5% (1/40).
Responcers: 5.0% (2/40).

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:02 am
by (Neon)
1 sabless get more if u cn n only 4 fire cards?????????????????????

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:49 am
by Gohar
I think it would be easier to first get used to 2 elemental decks (or even trying 1 element decks helps a lot). And 4 fire cards as Neon said is not really effective but rather troublesome. In gravity cards u might enjoy the race fungals as they are really effective and become increasingly powerful.

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:16 pm
by Shade
1.) Honestly its a 2 element deck.... only 4 card of different element doesnt make it a 3 element deck.
(Neon) wrote:1 sabless get more if u cn n only 4 fire cards?????????????????????
2.) hmmm but the thing is i just cant make a room from some chnages.. if i have to change 1 card i will have to rebuild it.
Sabless is only there to clear the BZ. too many creatures on the opponents field.. i dnt like... m searching for sum thing that would dests creatures with power 4000 or less...

3.) Thanks for the comments i will look forward to it.... and Gohar,
Gohar wrote:I think it would be easier to first get used to 2 elemental decks (or even trying 1 element decks helps a lot). And 4 fire cards as Neon said is not really effective but rather troublesome. In gravity cards u might enjoy the race fungals as they are really effective and become increasingly powerful.
i am looking forward for these changes...
:)

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 6:06 pm
by (Neon)
According to cf rule 4 cards of different element matters :P 8-) 8-) :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:41 am
by Mikara
I think that funeral pyre may not be worth the trouble in this deck, perhaps add in a second sable for late game field wiping. Id also suggest bumping up your equalizing pressure (a greatly flexible spell that can work pretty well with the amount of cr in your deck) and your jelly if your aiming for discard somehow. What is the goal of this deck btw?

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:44 am
by (Neon)
Mikara wrote:I think that funeral pyre may not be worth the trouble in this deck, perhaps add in a second sable for late game field wiping. Id also suggest bumping up your equalizing pressure (a greatly flexible spell that can work pretty well with the amount of cr in your deck) and your jelly if your aiming for discard somehow. What is the goal of this deck btw?
ya mika i also cudnt understand wt he want to do its all mixed up :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:44 am
by Night_Master
Well this deck was meant to be a control type deck... which i believe, the deck is no where near it.
oh well i need to work around this deck for a while..
Mikara wrote:I think that funeral pyre may not be worth the trouble in this deck, perhaps add in a second sable for late game field wiping.
Well Funeral Pyre did help me couple of times. and Sables Duress is a double edge blade... Pyre is a good combo with Sables in this deck, but iff it comes on correct times... coz its a 1 shot type card... and wormhole kinda help some times multiplying it.
on the other hand Sables does the trick most of the time. but as i was saying its a double edged blade. and if it would have destroyed creatures 4000 or less then it would have been even more deadlier... corrently the last 3 games i played, i found Sabless kickd my won ass. :/
Mikara wrote:Id also suggest bumping up your equalizing pressure (a greatly flexible spell that can work pretty well with the amount of cr in your deck)

humm... working on it..
Mikara wrote: and your jelly if your aiming for discard somehow.

Yea. Some how... its a luck factor... the next version i will discard them, and bring something that would help more..
Mikara wrote:What is the goal of this deck btw?
Still working on that.... actually when every i make a deck, i mix it up with DM thats y it becomes "Khichuri"...

Atm working on decks with 2 elements only. (as beginners) :)

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:55 am
by Gohar
lol "kichuri"
anyways i started of with dual elements and use them a lot but my strongest deck is mono-grav and ive beaten everyone at least once with it.
anyways at least tell ifyour aming for aggro, disruption, or any other deck type so helping would be easier.

Re: Uncertainty

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:40 pm
by (Neon)
Gohar wrote:lol "kichuri"
anyways i started of with dual elements and use them a lot but my strongest deck is mono-grav and ive beaten everyone at least once with it.
anyways at least tell ifyour aming for aggro, disruption, or any other deck type so helping would be easier.
hmm u right actually its totaly mixed up